Java Whetstone Benchmark - whetstc.class
The Java benchmarks comprise class files that were produced some time ago. But source codes are available to renew the files. Performance can vary significantly using different Java Virtual Machines.
Pi 5 performance gains, over the Pi 4, were beteen 1.94 and 3.81.
JavaDraw Benchmark - JavaDrawPi.class
The benchmark uses small to rather excessive simple objects to measure drawing performance in Frames Per Second (FPS). Five tests draw on a background of continuously changing colour shades, each test adding to the load.
The first runs of this benchmark on the Pi 5 indicated that it was much slower than the Pi 4 on the more demanding functions. Sometime later I reran the benchmark on the Pi 4, using the OS acquired for the Pi 5, and that also produced the slow results. Using this OS, the Pi 5 average performance was around twice as fast.
64 Bit OpenGL Benchmark - videogl64C10, videogl64C12
In 2012, I approved a request from a Quality Engineer at Canonical, to use this OpenGL benchmark in the testing framework of the Unity desktop software. The program can be run as a benchmark, or selected functions, as a stress test of any duration.
The benchmark measures graphics speed in terms of Frames Per Second (FPS) via six simple and more complex tests. The first four tests portray moving up and down a tunnel including various independently moving objects, with and without texturing. The last two tests, represent a real application for designing kitchens. The first is in wireframe format, drawn with 23,000 straight lines. The second has colours and textures applied to the surfaces.
As a benchmark, it was run using the following script file format, the first command needed to avoid VSYNC, allowing FPS to be greater than 60.
The original benchmark was compiled using freeglut3 but, more recently, this was not available for new systems. The gcc12 version was compiled without this but will not run on my Pi 4, Similarly, the gcc10 program is incompatible with the Pi 5.
Performance comparisons indicate that the Pi 5 was between 2.9 and 5.2 times faster than the Pi 4, with an average of 4.0 times over the 24 measurements. The GLUT variety was recompiled on the Pi 4, using GCC 12. The average Pi5 gain then became 2.5 times.
The Java benchmarks comprise class files that were produced some time ago. But source codes are available to renew the files. Performance can vary significantly using different Java Virtual Machines.
Pi 5 performance gains, over the Pi 4, were beteen 1.94 and 3.81.
Code:
Pi 4 Whetstone Benchmark Java Version, May 22 2020, 14:24:09 1 Pass Test Result MFLOPS MOPS millisecs N1 floating point -1.124750137 521 0.0369 N2 floating point -1.131330490 481 0.2792 N3 if then else 1.000000000 236 0.4378 N4 fixed point 12.000000000 1320 0.2386 N5 sin,cos etc. 0.499110132 48 1.7348 N6 floating point 0.999999821 276 1.9520 N7 assignments 3.000000000 320 0.5772 N8 exp,sqrt etc. 0.825148463 25 1.4640 MWIPS 1488 6.7205 Operating System Linux, Arch. aarch64, Version 4.19.118-v8+ Java Vendor Debian, Version 11.0.7 CPU null Pi 5 Whetstone Benchmark Java Version, Aug 24 2023, 23:25:17 1 Pass Pi 5/4 Test Result MFLOPS MOPS millisecs N1 floating point -1.124750137 1232 0.0156 2.37 N2 floating point -1.131330490 1048 0.1282 2.18 N3 if then else 1.000000000 715 0.1448 3.02 N4 fixed point 12.000000000 2559 0.1231 1.94 N5 sin,cos etc. 0.499110132 183 0.4550 3.81 N6 floating point 0.999999821 554 0.9730 2.00 N7 assignments 3.000000000 624 0.2960 1.95 N8 exp,sqrt etc. 0.935364604 63 0.5920 2.47 MWIPS 3666 2.7277 2.46 Pi 5 performance gains, over the Pi 4, were beteen 1.94 and 3.81.[code] Pi 4 Whetstone Benchmark Java Version, May 22 2020, 14:24:09 1 Pass Test Result MFLOPS MOPS millisecs N1 floating point -1.124750137 521 0.0369 N2 floating point -1.131330490 481 0.2792 N3 if then else 1.000000000 236 0.4378 N4 fixed point 12.000000000 1320 0.2386 N5 sin,cos etc. 0.499110132 48 1.7348 N6 floating point 0.999999821 276 1.9520 N7 assignments 3.000000000 320 0.5772 N8 exp,sqrt etc. 0.825148463 25 1.4640 MWIPS 1488 6.7205 Operating System Linux, Arch. aarch64, Version 4.19.118-v8+ Java Vendor Debian, Version 11.0.7 CPU null Pi 5 Whetstone Benchmark Java Version, Aug 24 2023, 23:25:17 1 Pass Pi 5/4 Test Result MFLOPS MOPS millisecs N1 floating point -1.124750137 1232 0.0156 2.37 N2 floating point -1.131330490 1048 0.1282 2.18 N3 if then else 1.000000000 715 0.1448 3.02 N4 fixed point 12.000000000 2559 0.1231 1.94 N5 sin,cos etc. 0.499110132 183 0.4550 3.81 N6 floating point 0.999999821 554 0.9730 2.00 N7 assignments 3.000000000 624 0.2960 1.95 N8 exp,sqrt etc. 0.935364604 63 0.5920 2.47 MWIPS 3666 2.7277 2.46 Pi 5 performance gains, over the Pi 4, were beteen 1.94 and 3.81.[code] Pi 4 Whetstone Benchmark Java Version, May 22 2020, 14:24:09 1 Pass Test Result MFLOPS MOPS millisecs N1 floating point -1.124750137 521 0.0369 N2 floating point -1.131330490 481 0.2792 N3 if then else 1.000000000 236 0.4378 N4 fixed point 12.000000000 1320 0.2386 N5 sin,cos etc. 0.499110132 48 1.7348 N6 floating point 0.999999821 276 1.9520 N7 assignments 3.000000000 320 0.5772 N8 exp,sqrt etc. 0.825148463 25 1.4640 MWIPS 1488 6.7205 Operating System Linux, Arch. aarch64, Version 4.19.118-v8+ Java Vendor Debian, Version 11.0.7 CPU null Pi 5 Whetstone Benchmark Java Version, Aug 24 2023, 23:25:17 1 Pass Pi 5/4 Test Result MFLOPS MOPS millisecs N1 floating point -1.124750137 1232 0.0156 2.37 N2 floating point -1.131330490 1048 0.1282 2.18 N3 if then else 1.000000000 715 0.1448 3.02 N4 fixed point 12.000000000 2559 0.1231 1.94 N5 sin,cos etc. 0.499110132 183 0.4550 3.81 N6 floating point 0.999999821 554 0.9730 2.00 N7 assignments 3.000000000 624 0.2960 1.95 N8 exp,sqrt etc. 0.935364604 63 0.5920 2.47 MWIPS 3666 2.7277 2.46 JavaDraw Benchmark - JavaDrawPi.class
The benchmark uses small to rather excessive simple objects to measure drawing performance in Frames Per Second (FPS). Five tests draw on a background of continuously changing colour shades, each test adding to the load.
The first runs of this benchmark on the Pi 5 indicated that it was much slower than the Pi 4 on the more demanding functions. Sometime later I reran the benchmark on the Pi 4, using the OS acquired for the Pi 5, and that also produced the slow results. Using this OS, the Pi 5 average performance was around twice as fast.
Code:
Pi 4 Java Drawing Benchmark, May 22 2020, 14:25:15 Produced by javac 1.8.0_222 Test Frames FPS Display PNG Bitmap Twice Pass 1 833 83.26 Display PNG Bitmap Twice Pass 2 1001 100.05 Plus 2 SweepGradient Circles 994 99.39 Plus 200 Random Small Circles 836 83.54 Plus 320 Long Lines 380 37.98 Plus 4000 Random Small Circles 95 9.44 Total Elapsed Time 60.1 seconds Operating System Linux, Arch. aarch64, Version 4.19.118-v8+ Java Vendor Debian, Version 11.0.7 null, null CPUs[b] Pi 4[/b] Java Drawing Benchmark, Dec 2 2023, 10:01:16 Produced by javac 1.8.0_222 Test Frames FPS Display PNG Bitmap Twice Pass 1 469 46.86 Display PNG Bitmap Twice Pass 2 561 56.06 Plus 2 SweepGradient Circles 523 52.21 Plus 200 Random Small Circles 31 2.97 Plus 320 Long Lines 13 1.22 Plus 4000 Random Small Circles 2 0.18 Total Elapsed Time 62.5 seconds[b] Operating System Linux, Arch. aarch64, Version 6.1.47-v8+ Java Vendor Debian, Version 17.0.8[/b] null, null CPUs[b] Pi 5[/b] Java Drawing Benchmark, Aug 26 2023, 15:06:26 Produced by javac 1.8.0_222 Test Frames FPS Pi5/Pi4 Display PNG Bitmap Twice Pass 1 1000 99.96 2.13 Display PNG Bitmap Twice Pass 2 1077 107.66 1.92 Plus 2 SweepGradient Circles 1010 100.99 1.93 Plus 200 Random Small Circles 63 6.16 2.07 Plus 320 Long Lines 26 2.50 2.05 Plus 4000 Random Small Circles 4 0.32 1.78 Total Elapsed Time 63.1 seconds[b] Operating System Linux, Arch. aarch64, Version 6.1.32-v8+ Java Vendor Debian, Version 17.0.8[/b] null, null CPUs Pi 5 Java Drawing Benchmark, Aug 26 2023, 15:15:27 Produced by javac openjdk 17.0.8 Test Frames FPS Display PNG Bitmap Twice Pass 1 1014 101.33 Display PNG Bitmap Twice Pass 2 1067 106.59 Plus 2 SweepGradient Circles 1028 102.70 Plus 200 Random Small Circles 61 6.04 Plus 320 Long Lines 25 2.47 Plus 4000 Random Small Circles 4 0.33 Total Elapsed Time 62.3 seconds Operating System Linux, Arch. aarch64, Version 6.1.32-v8+ Java Vendor Debian, Version 17.0.8 null, null CPUs In 2012, I approved a request from a Quality Engineer at Canonical, to use this OpenGL benchmark in the testing framework of the Unity desktop software. The program can be run as a benchmark, or selected functions, as a stress test of any duration.
The benchmark measures graphics speed in terms of Frames Per Second (FPS) via six simple and more complex tests. The first four tests portray moving up and down a tunnel including various independently moving objects, with and without texturing. The last two tests, represent a real application for designing kitchens. The first is in wireframe format, drawn with 23,000 straight lines. The second has colours and textures applied to the surfaces.
As a benchmark, it was run using the following script file format, the first command needed to avoid VSYNC, allowing FPS to be greater than 60.
Code:
export vblank_mode=0 ./videogl64CXX Width 320, Height 240, NoEnd ./videogl64Cxx Width 640, Height 480, NoHeading, NoEnd ./videogl64Cxx Width 1024, Height 768, NoHeading, NoEnd ./videogl64Cxx Width 1920, Height 1080, NoHeading Performance comparisons indicate that the Pi 5 was between 2.9 and 5.2 times faster than the Pi 4, with an average of 4.0 times over the 24 measurements. The GLUT variety was recompiled on the Pi 4, using GCC 12. The average Pi5 gain then became 2.5 times.
Code:
Pi 4 gcc 10 GLUT OpenGL Benchmark 64 GCC 10, Wed Sep 20 00:48:11 2023 Running Time Approximately 5 Seconds Each Test Window Size Coloured Objects Textured Objects WireFrm Texture Pixels Few All Few All Kitchen Kitchen Wide High FPS FPS FPS FPS FPS FPS 320 240 727.7 413.0 219.7 131.9 42.8 28.9 640 480 388.6 281.9 189.2 118.0 42.5 28.1 1024 768 144.0 141.2 129.8 96.9 41.6 26.8 1920 1080 54.1 50.2 52.7 56.7 38.4 23.9 End at Wed Sep 20 00:50:26 2023 Pi 5 gcc 12 GLUT OpenGL Benchmark 64 Bit GCC 12, Thu Oct 26 14:52:15 2023 Running Time Approximately 5 Seconds Each Test Window Size Coloured Objects Textured Objects WireFrm Texture Pixels Few All Few All Kitchen Kitchen Wide High FPS FPS FPS FPS FPS FPS 320 240 3184.7 1554.8 894.7 474.2 224.0 120.0 640 480 1441.4 956.8 819.1 442.2 220.4 116.7 1024 768 624.6 493.7 474.7 364.0 199.1 106.4 1920 1080 221.4 198.6 194.4 165.8 137.9 87.6 End at Thu Oct 26 14:54:28 2023 Pi 5/4 Comparison Window Size Coloured Objects Textured Objects WireFrm Texture Pixels Few All Few All Kitchen Kitchen Wide High FPS FPS FPS FPS FPS FPS 320 240 4.4 3.8 4.1 3.6 5.2 4.2 640 480 3.7 3.4 4.3 3.7 5.2 4.2 1024 768 4.3 3.5 3.7 3.8 4.8 4.0 1920 1080 4.1 4.0 3.7 2.9 3.6 3.7 #####################################################################Pi 4 GLUT OpenGL Benchmark 64 Bit GCC 12, Sat Dec 2 11:35:48 2023 Running Time Approximately 5 Seconds Each Test Window Size Coloured Objects Textured Objects WireFrm Texture Pixels Few All Few All Kitchen Kitchen Wide High FPS FPS FPS FPS FPS FPS 320 240 1137.1 517.1 308.3 159.7 93.5 49.6 640 480 579.0 356.8 283.9 150.5 92.5 48.7 1024 768 239.5 200.9 203.4 134.7 84.9 45.3 2032 1080 92.8 74.3 93.6 81.1 75.2 37.6 End at Sat Dec 2 11:38:02 2023 Statistics: Posted by RoyLongbottom — Tue Jan 16, 2024 4:33 pm